Combining Philosophers

Ideas for B Hale / C Wright, Allan Gibbard and Aristotle

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


8 ideas

1. Philosophy / A. Wisdom / 1. Nature of Wisdom
Wisdom is scientific and intuitive knowledge of what is by nature most precious [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Wisdom is scientific and intuitive knowledge of what is by nature most precious.
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1141b03)
     A reaction: Precious for what? Theoretical or practical? Note the implied rational and empirical routes to wisdom.
Wisdom does not study happiness, because it is not concerned with processes [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Wisdom studies none of the things that go to make a man happy, because it is not concerned with any kind of process.
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1143b20)
     A reaction: This seems to be a very Platonic view, and not really consistent with Aristotle's overall metaphysics. It strikes me as simply wrong. Maybe all of reality is a process, and wisdom is then a maximum understanding of that process.
Knowledge chosen for its own sake, rather than for results, is wisdom [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Knowledge chosen for itself and for the sake of knowledge is wisdom, more than that which is chosen for results.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0982a12)
     A reaction: Well something has to be for its own sake! But what about trivial knowledge? That question led Plato to the Forms.
There is practical wisdom (for action), and theoretical wisdom (for deep understanding) [Aristotle, by Whitcomb]
     Full Idea: Aristotle takes wisdom to come in two forms, the practical and the theoretical, the former of which is good judgement about how to act, and the latter of which is deep knowledge or understanding.
     From: report of Aristotle (works [c.330 BCE]) by Dennis Whitcomb - Wisdom Intro
     A reaction: The interesting question is then whether the two are connected. One might be thoroughly 'sensible' about action, without counting as 'wise', which seems to require a broader view of what is being done. Whitcomb endorses Aristotle on this idea.
Wisdom seeks explanations, causes, and reasons why things are as they are [Aristotle, by Politis]
     Full Idea: Aristotle characterises wisdom as a search for explanations (aitiai, which can also be translated as 'causes') and explanatory knowledge (epistemé, knowledge why something is as it is).
     From: report of Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], Bk 01.2) by Vassilis Politis - Aristotle and the Metaphysics 1.1
     A reaction: I think this idea might be a key one for modern philosophers, if they are searching for a metaphysics which can be integrated with modern science.
1. Philosophy / A. Wisdom / 2. Wise People
Aristotle thinks human life is not important enough to spend a whole life on it [Nagel on Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Aristotle believes, in short, that human life is not important enough for humans to spend their lives on.
     From: comment on Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE]) by Thomas Nagel - Aristotle on Eudaimonia p.12
     A reaction: The explanation of why Aristotle values contemplation more highly than the moral virtues.
Wise people can contemplate alone, though co-operation helps [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: The wise man can practise contemplation by himself (though no doubt he does it better with fellow-workers).
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1177a32)
     A reaction: It is hard to argue with this balanced view of the individual versus team concept of philosophy.
It is not much help if a doctor knows about universals but not the immediate particular [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: If a doctor were to have a theoretical account without experience, knowing the universal but not the immediate particular, he will often err in treatment.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0981a25)
     A reaction: But acquaintance with particulars isn't the same as knowledge, which may require universals.