Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Lynch,MP/Glasgow,JM, Aristotle and R Keefe / P Smith

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


26 ideas

1. Philosophy / A. Wisdom / 1. Nature of Wisdom
Wisdom is scientific and intuitive knowledge of what is by nature most precious [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Wisdom is scientific and intuitive knowledge of what is by nature most precious.
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1141b03)
     A reaction: Precious for what? Theoretical or practical? Note the implied rational and empirical routes to wisdom.
Wisdom does not study happiness, because it is not concerned with processes [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Wisdom studies none of the things that go to make a man happy, because it is not concerned with any kind of process.
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1143b20)
     A reaction: This seems to be a very Platonic view, and not really consistent with Aristotle's overall metaphysics. It strikes me as simply wrong. Maybe all of reality is a process, and wisdom is then a maximum understanding of that process.
Knowledge chosen for its own sake, rather than for results, is wisdom [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Knowledge chosen for itself and for the sake of knowledge is wisdom, more than that which is chosen for results.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0982a12)
     A reaction: Well something has to be for its own sake! But what about trivial knowledge? That question led Plato to the Forms.
There is practical wisdom (for action), and theoretical wisdom (for deep understanding) [Aristotle, by Whitcomb]
     Full Idea: Aristotle takes wisdom to come in two forms, the practical and the theoretical, the former of which is good judgement about how to act, and the latter of which is deep knowledge or understanding.
     From: report of Aristotle (works [c.330 BCE]) by Dennis Whitcomb - Wisdom Intro
     A reaction: The interesting question is then whether the two are connected. One might be thoroughly 'sensible' about action, without counting as 'wise', which seems to require a broader view of what is being done. Whitcomb endorses Aristotle on this idea.
Wisdom seeks explanations, causes, and reasons why things are as they are [Aristotle, by Politis]
     Full Idea: Aristotle characterises wisdom as a search for explanations (aitiai, which can also be translated as 'causes') and explanatory knowledge (epistemé, knowledge why something is as it is).
     From: report of Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], Bk 01.2) by Vassilis Politis - Aristotle and the Metaphysics 1.1
     A reaction: I think this idea might be a key one for modern philosophers, if they are searching for a metaphysics which can be integrated with modern science.
1. Philosophy / A. Wisdom / 2. Wise People
Aristotle thinks human life is not important enough to spend a whole life on it [Nagel on Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Aristotle believes, in short, that human life is not important enough for humans to spend their lives on.
     From: comment on Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE]) by Thomas Nagel - Aristotle on Eudaimonia p.12
     A reaction: The explanation of why Aristotle values contemplation more highly than the moral virtues.
Wise people can contemplate alone, though co-operation helps [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: The wise man can practise contemplation by himself (though no doubt he does it better with fellow-workers).
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1177a32)
     A reaction: It is hard to argue with this balanced view of the individual versus team concept of philosophy.
It is not much help if a doctor knows about universals but not the immediate particular [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: If a doctor were to have a theoretical account without experience, knowing the universal but not the immediate particular, he will often err in treatment.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0981a25)
     A reaction: But acquaintance with particulars isn't the same as knowledge, which may require universals.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 1. Philosophy
All philosophy begins from wonder, either at the physical world, or at ideas [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: All men begin to philosophise from wonder, for example at the changes of the sun, or the incommensurability of the diameter (pi)
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0983a14)
     A reaction: If it doesn't begin with wonder, what does it begin with?
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 2. Invocation to Philosophy
Without extensive examination firm statements are hard, but studying the difficulties is profitable [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: It is hard to make firm statements on these questions without having examined them many times, but to have gone through the various difficulties is not unprofitable.
     From: Aristotle (Categories [c.331 BCE], 08b23)
     A reaction: Suggesting that philosophy is more like drawing the map than completing the journey.
If each of us can give some logos about parts of nature, our combined efforts can be impressive [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Each of us is able to give a logos about some part of nature and even though as individuals little or nothing is added to the truth, from all of us contributing together something grand comes about.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0993b04)
     A reaction: Aristotle sees philosophy and science as group activities.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 3. Philosophy Defined
Philosophy is a kind of science that deals with principles [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Philosophy is a kind of science that deals with principles.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 1059a13)
     A reaction: So is philosophy just part of science - the bit that tries to explain the abstract instead of the physical?
Absolute thinking is the thinking of thinking [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Absolute thinking is the thinking of thinking.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 1074b28)
     A reaction: Connects to the apparently unique human ability to reflect about our own thoughts.
Philosophy has different powers from dialectic, and a different life from sophistry [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Philosophy differs from dialectic in the manner of its powers, and from sophistry in the choice of life that it involves.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 1004b17)
     A reaction: Note the separation of dialectic from the heart of philosophy, and the claim that philosophy is a way of life.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 4. Divisions of Philosophy
If only natural substances exist, science is first philosophy - but not if there is an immovable substance [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: If there is no substance other than those which are formed by nature, natural science will be the first science; but if there is an immovable substance, the science of this must be prior and must be first philosophy.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 1026a28)
     A reaction: For Aristotle science is mainly finding the causes of everything. Does he think physical science is the way to study ethics and politics. Maybe, via essential natures and natural functions.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 5. Aims of Philosophy / a. Philosophy as worldly
Free and great-souled men do not keep asking "what is the use of it?" [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: To be constantly asking 'what is the use of it?' is unbecoming to those of great soul, and unworthy of free men.
     From: Aristotle (Politics [c.332 BCE], 1338b01)
     A reaction: Love this one! It is not just philosophers who keep hearing this question. Pure mathematics, history, literature, even carpentry if you are not going to be a carpenter.
Unobservant thinkers tend to dogmatise using insufficient facts [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Those whom devotion to abstract discussions has rendered unobservant of the facts are too ready to dogmatise on the basis of a few observations.
     From: Aristotle (Coming-to-be and Passing-away (Gen/Corr) [c.335 BCE], 316a09)
     A reaction: I totally approve of the idea that a good philosopher should be 'observant'. Prestige in modern analytic philosophy comes from logical ability. There should be some rival criterion for attentiveness to facts, with equal prestige.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 5. Aims of Philosophy / c. Philosophy as generalisation
Wisdom is knowledge of principles and causes [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Wisdom is knowledge having to do with certain principles [archas] and causes [aitias].
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0982a02)
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 5. Aims of Philosophy / d. Philosophy as puzzles
Inquiry is the cause of philosophy [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Inquiry is the cause of philosophy.
     From: Aristotle (Protrepticus (frags) [c.334 BCE]), quoted by Alexander Nehamas - Eristic,Antilogic,Sophistic,Dialectic p.120
     A reaction: The earlier part of the quote says philosophical thinking is inescapable (even if philosophy is impossible). I suppose we would call it 'curiosity'.
Translate as 'humans all desire by nature to understand' (not as 'to know') [Aristotle, by Annas]
     Full Idea: Aristotle says that 'humans all desire by nature to understand'. The Greek word here is often translated as 'to know', but this can be misleading. It is not a piling up of known facts, ..but mastery of a field of knowledge, and explaining why.
     From: report of Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0980a22) by Julia Annas - Ancient Philosophy: very short introduction Ch.1
     A reaction: I take this gloss of Annas's to be highly significant if we are trying to understand Aristotle, since it appears to be the single most significant remark from him of what his life's work was about.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 6. Hopes for Philosophy
Even people who go astray in their opinions have contributed something useful [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: We should not only be grateful to those in whose opinions we at all share but also to those who have gone astray, for even the latter have contributed something.
     From: Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE], 0993b12)
     A reaction: Yes, but what have they contributed? Have they revealed lines of reasoning, or are they just a terrible warning?
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 7. Despair over Philosophy
Most people are readier to submit to compulsion than to argument [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: Most people are readier to submit to compulsion and punishment than to argument and fine ideals.
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1180a05)
     A reaction: How perceptively pessimistic. We must hope that the picture has changed now that we have fairly universal education. Some people may submit to argument, but NOT to fine ideals.
1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 1. Nature of Analysis
Our method of inquiry is to examine the smallest parts that make up the whole [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: The method of inquiry that has guided us elsewhere is … that a composite must be analyzed until we reach things that are incomposite, since these are the smallest parts of the whole.
     From: Aristotle (Politics [c.332 BCE], 1252a18)
     A reaction: Aristotle studies things, and aims to reveal their essential natures, so this is part of his method. You still have to grasp the essential natures of the atoms that compose the whole, however. To understand a city, understand people.
1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 2. Analysis by Division
Begin examination with basics, and subdivide till you can go no further [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: The examination must be carried on and begin from the primary classes and then go on step by step until further division is impossible.
     From: Aristotle (Topics [c.331 BCE], 109b17)
     A reaction: This is a good slogan for the analytic approach to thought. I take Aristotle (or possibly Socrates) to be the father of analysis, not Frege (though see Idea 9840). (He may be thinking of the tableau method of proof).
1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 7. Limitations of Analysis
Trained minds never expect more precision than is possible [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: It is the mark of the trained mind never to expect more precision in the treatment of any subject than the nature of that subject permits.
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1094b18)
     A reaction: An excellent remark in the context of moral philosophy. There is a dream that moral principles might derive from pure reason, or consist of a single rule expressible in a few words, but daily life isn't like that, and morality is not likely to be.
1. Philosophy / G. Scientific Philosophy / 1. Aims of Science
The object of scientific knowledge is what is necessary [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: The object of scientific knowledge is what is necessary.
     From: Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE], 1139b24)
     A reaction: This is diametrically opposed to the Humean view, which takes the nature of each thing, and the laws which guide it, to be contingent. Kripke has pointed us towards necessities in nature.