display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
6 ideas
10709 | Priority is a modality, arising from collections and members [Potter] |
Full Idea: We must conclude that priority is a modality distinct from that of time or necessity, a modality arising in some way out of the manner in which a collection is constituted from its members. | |
From: Michael Potter (Set Theory and Its Philosophy [2004], 03.3) | |
A reaction: He is referring to the 'iterative' view of sets, and cites Aristotle 'Metaphysics' 1019a1-4 as background. |
24077 | Necessity is thought to require an event, but is only an after-effect of the event [Nietzsche] |
Full Idea: Necessity is supposed to be the cause of something coming to be: in truth it is often only an effect of what has come to be. | |
From: Friedrich Nietzsche (The Gay (Joyful) Science [1882], §205) | |
A reaction: This sounds like an account of the traditional idea of destiny - which sees inevitability in some major event, which was previously unpredictable. |
7134 | Something can be irrefutable; that doesn't make it true [Nietzsche] |
Full Idea: Something can be irrefutable; that doesn't make it true. | |
From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Writings from Late Notebooks [1887], 34[247]) | |
A reaction: This is a warning to rationalists who are looking for strategies to demonstrate necessities a priori. |
4528 | For me, a priori 'truths' are just provisional assumptions [Nietzsche] |
Full Idea: The most strongly believed a priori 'truths' are for me provisional assumptions (e.g. the law of causality). | |
From: Friedrich Nietzsche (The Will to Power (notebooks) [1888], §497) | |
A reaction: The example of causality would fit in with Humean scepticism, but presumably Nietzsche would also apply it to maths and logic, since he is a thorough-going relativist. I cautiously disagree. |
7186 | There are no necessary truths, but something must be held to be true [Nietzsche] |
Full Idea: What's necessary is that something must be held to be true; not that something is true. | |
From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Writings from Late Notebooks [1887], 09[38]) | |
A reaction: This may be right, but it doesn't follow that the truths we label as 'necessary' are the ones that we have to believe, or even that we have to believe that our chosen beliefs are necessary rather than contingent. Why did we pick those beliefs? |
22281 | A material conditional cannot capture counterfactual reasoning [Potter] |
Full Idea: What the material conditional most significantly fails to capture is counterfactual reasoning. | |
From: Michael Potter (The Rise of Analytic Philosophy 1879-1930 [2020], 04 'Sem') | |
A reaction: The point is that counterfactuals say 'if P were the case (which it isn't), then Q'. But that means P is false, and in the material conditional everything follows from a falsehood. A reinterpretation of the conditional might embrace counterfactuals. |