Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Paul Ricoeur, Leonhard Euler and Ian McFetridge
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
10 ideas
10. Modality / A. Necessity / 6. Logical Necessity
12184
|
Logical necessity overrules all other necessities [McFetridge]
|
15083
|
The fundamental case of logical necessity is the valid conclusion of an inference [McFetridge, by Hale]
|
15084
|
In the McFetridge view, logical necessity means a consequent must be true if the antecedent is [McFetridge, by Hale]
|
12180
|
Logical necessity requires that a valid argument be necessary [McFetridge]
|
12181
|
Traditionally, logical necessity is the strongest, and entails any other necessities [McFetridge]
|
12183
|
It is only logical necessity if there is absolutely no sense in which it could be false [McFetridge]
|
12192
|
The mark of logical necessity is deduction from any suppositions whatever [McFetridge]
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 2. Epistemic possibility
12182
|
We assert epistemic possibility without commitment to logical possibility [McFetridge]
|
10. Modality / C. Sources of Modality / 1. Sources of Necessity
12187
|
Objectual modal realists believe in possible worlds; non-objectual ones rest it on the actual world [McFetridge]
|
10. Modality / C. Sources of Modality / 5. Modality from Actuality
12186
|
Modal realists hold that necessities and possibilities are part of the totality of facts [McFetridge]
|