Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Willard Quine, Robert B. Brandom and Frank P. Ramsey
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
12 ideas
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 1. Possibility
15782
|
Quine wants identity and individuation-conditions for possibilia [Quine, by Lycan]
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 8. Conditionals / b. Types of conditional
9014
|
Some conditionals can be explained just by negation and conjunction: not(p and not-q) [Quine]
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 8. Conditionals / c. Truth-function conditionals
15725
|
Normal conditionals have a truth-value gap when the antecedent is false. [Quine]
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 8. Conditionals / d. Non-truthfunction conditionals
13766
|
'If' is the same as 'given that', so the degrees of belief should conform to probability theory [Ramsey, by Ramsey]
|
10993
|
Ramsey's Test: believe the consequent if you believe the antecedent [Ramsey, by Read]
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 8. Conditionals / e. Supposition conditionals
15722
|
Conditionals are pointless if the truth value of the antecedent is known [Quine]
|
14279
|
Asking 'If p, will q?' when p is uncertain, then first add p hypothetically to your knowledge [Ramsey]
|
22432
|
Normally conditionals have no truth value; it is the consequent which has a conditional truth value [Quine]
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 9. Counterfactuals
15719
|
We feign belief in counterfactual antecedents, and assess how convincing the consequent is [Quine]
|
15721
|
Counterfactuals are plausible when dispositions are involved, as they imply structures [Quine]
|
15724
|
Counterfactuals have no place in a strict account of science [Quine]
|
15720
|
What stays the same in assessing a counterfactual antecedent depends on context [Quine]
|