Combining Philosophers

Ideas for H.Putnam/P.Oppenheim, Roger Fry and Friedrich Nietzsche

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


4 ideas

11. Knowledge Aims / B. Certain Knowledge / 1. Certainty
Being certain presumes that there are absolute truths, and means of arriving at them [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: Conviction is the belief that in some point of knowledge one possesses absolute truth. Such a belief presumes, then, that absolute truths exists; likewise, that the perfect methods for arriving at them have been found.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Human, All Too Human [1878], 630)
A note for asses: What convinces is not necessarily true - it is merely convincing [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: What convinces is not necessarily true - it is merely convincing (a note for asses).
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (The Will to Power (notebooks) [1888], §017)
     A reaction: I hope I am not such an ass that I need Nietzsche to explain this, as I have always thought it true. Many good modern epistemologists seem to me guilty of this error, though. Pragmatists, riff-raff like that…
11. Knowledge Aims / B. Certain Knowledge / 5. Cogito Critique
Belief in the body is better established than belief in the mind [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: Belief in the body is better established than belief in the mind.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Writings from Late Notebooks [1887], 40[15])
     A reaction: Compare Spinoza in Idea 4833. Hawking says he thinks better because he is largely paralysed. Externalism about mind makes it necessarily a part of the world and hence physical. I am inclined to agree with Nietzsche.
The 'I' does not think; it is a construction of thinking, like other useful abstractions [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: I do not grant to the metaphysicians that the 'I' is what thinks: on the contrary I take the I itself as a construction thinking, of the same rank as 'material',' thing', 'substance', 'purpose', 'number': therefore only as a regulative fiction.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1885-86 [1886], 35[35])
     A reaction: Ah. I have always defended the Self, the thing that is in charge when the mind is directed to something. I suddenly see that this is compatible with the Self not being the thinker! It is just the willer, and the controller of the searchlight. Self = will?