display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
2 ideas
4539 | The forms of 'knowledge' about logic which precede experience are actually regulations of belief [Nietzsche] |
Full Idea: The basic laws of logic (identity and contradiction) are said to be forms of pure knowledge because they precede experience. But these are not forms of knowledge at all! They are regulative articles of belief. | |
From: Friedrich Nietzsche (The Will to Power (notebooks) [1888], §530) | |
A reaction: This is a standard objection to foundationalism - that the basic beliefs (of reason, or raw experience) are not actually knowledge. We can all speculate about their origin and basis. Personally I think 'truth' must be somewhere in the explanation. |
24138 | Strongly believed a priori is not certain; it may just be a feature of our existence [Nietzsche] |
Full Idea: What we believe the most, everything a priori, is not for that reason more certain, just because it is so strongly believed. Rather, it is perhaps a consequence of the condition for the existence of our species. | |
From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1884-85 [1884], 25[307]) | |
A reaction: This is in defiance of Leibniz and Kant. His proposed explanation is not very convincing. Russell agreed with Nietzsche. |