Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Jerry A. Fodor, J.H. Fetzer and Richard Wollheim

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


10 ideas

12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 3. Innate Knowledge / a. Innate knowledge
Evolution suggests that innate knowledge of human psychology would be beneficial [Fodor]
     Full Idea: If I had to design homo sapiens, I would have made commonsense knowledge of homo sapiens psychology innate; that way nobody would have to spend time learning it.
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (Psychosemantics [1987], p.132)
Contrary to commonsense, most of what is in the mind seems to be unlearned [Fodor]
     Full Idea: Contrary to commonsense, it looks as though much of what is in the mind is unlearned.
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (Psychosemantics [1987], p. 15)
Sticklebacks have an innate idea that red things are rivals [Fodor]
     Full Idea: God gave the male stickleback the idea that whatever is red is a rival.
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (Psychosemantics [1987], p.133)
12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 6. Inference in Perception
Maybe explaining the mechanics of perception will explain the concepts involved [Fodor]
     Full Idea: Why mightn't fleshing out the standard psychological account of perception itself count as learning what perceptual justification amounts to?
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (In a Critical Condition [2000], Ch. 1)
12. Knowledge Sources / C. Rationalism / 1. Rationalism
Rationalism can be based on an evolved computational brain with innate structure [Fodor]
     Full Idea: Pinker's rationalism involves four main ideas: mind is a computational system, which is massively modular with a lot of innate structure resulting from evolution.
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (In a Critical Condition [2000], Ch.17)
12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 2. Associationism
According to empiricists abstraction is the fundamental mental process [Fodor]
     Full Idea: According to empiricists, the fundamental mental process is not theory construction but abstraction.
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (In a Critical Condition [2000], Ch.12)
Associations are held to connect Ideas together in the way the world is connected together [Fodor]
     Full Idea: The laws of associations were held to explicate the semantic coherence of intentional processes, which adjust the causal relations among Ideas to reflect corresponding relations among the things that they're ideas of.
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (Jerry A. Fodor on himself [1994], p.296)
     A reaction: With the support of evolution, and the backing of a correspondence theory of truth, plus more sophistication in the associations, this might work.
Associationism can't explain how truth is preserved [Fodor]
     Full Idea: The essential problem is to explain how thinking manages reliably to preserve truth; and Associationism, as Kant rightly pointed out to Hume, hasn't the resources to do so.
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (Concepts:where cogn.science went wrong [1998], Ch.1)
     A reaction: One might be able to give an associationist account of truth-preservation if one became a bit more externalist about it, so that the normal association patterns track their connections with the external world.
12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 3. Pragmatism
Pragmatism is the worst idea ever [Fodor]
     Full Idea: Pragmatism is perhaps the worst idea that philosophy ever had.
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (LOT 2 [2008], Ch.1)
     A reaction: Not an argument, but an interesting sign of the times. Most major modern American philosophers, such as Quine, seem to fit some loose label of 'pragmatist'. I always smell a feeble relativism, and a refusal to face the interesting questions.
12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 5. Empiricism Critique
Rationalists say there is more to a concept than the experience that prompts it [Fodor]
     Full Idea: That there is more in the content of a concept than there is in the experiences that prompt us to form it is the burden of the traditional rationalist critique of empiricism (as worked out by Leibniz and Kant).
     From: Jerry A. Fodor (In a Critical Condition [2000], Ch.12)