Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Buddhaghosa, Plotinus and Timothy McGrew

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers

---

8 ideas

13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / a. Evidence

19687

Absence of evidence proves nothing, and weird claims need special evidence [McGrew]

19684

Does spotting a new possibility count as evidence? [McGrew]

19688

Every event is highly unlikely (in detail), but may be perfectly plausible [McGrew]

19686

Criminal law needs two separate witnesses, but historians will accept one witness [McGrew]

19680

Maybe all evidence consists of beliefs, rather than of facts [McGrew]

19681

If all evidence is propositional, what is the evidence for the proposition? Do we face a regress? [McGrew]

19689

Several unreliable witnesses can give good support, if they all say the same thing [McGrew]

13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / b. Evidentialism

19683

Narrow evidentialism relies wholly on propositions; the wider form includes other items [McGrew]