Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Diogenes Laertius, Michael Faraday and Bernecker / Dretske
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
8 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 1. Justification / a. Justification issues
|
3752
|
Justification can be of the belief, or of the person holding the belief [Bernecker/Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 2. Justification Challenges / a. Agrippa's trilemma
|
1816
|
Sceptics say demonstration depends on self-demonstrating things, or indemonstrable things [Diog. Laertius]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / a. Foundationalism
|
3753
|
Foundationalism aims to avoid an infinite regress [Bernecker/Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / f. Foundationalism critique
|
3754
|
Infallible sensations can't be foundations if they are non-epistemic [Bernecker/Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 1. External Justification
|
3755
|
Justification is normative, so it can't be reduced to cognitive psychology [Bernecker/Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 1. Scepticism
|
1819
|
Scepticism has two dogmas: that nothing is definable, and every argument has an opposite argument [Diog. Laertius]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
|
3064
|
When sceptics say that nothing is definable, or all arguments have an opposite, they are being dogmatic [Diog. Laertius]
|
|
3761
|
Modern arguments against the sceptic are epistemological and semantic externalism, and the focus on relevance [Bernecker/Dretske]
|