Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Frank Close, Stewart Cohen and Francesco Orsi
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
8 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism
19558
|
Our own intuitions about whether we know tend to vacillate [Cohen,S]
|
19561
|
We shouldn't jump too quickly to a contextualist account of claims to know [Cohen,S]
|
19563
|
The context sensitivity of knowledge derives from its justification [Cohen,S]
|
19560
|
Contextualism is good because it allows knowledge, but bad because 'knowing' is less valued [Cohen,S]
|
12893
|
Contextualism says sceptical arguments are true, relative to their strict context [Cohen,S]
|
12896
|
Knowledge is context-sensitive, because justification is [Cohen,S]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / b. Invariantism
12894
|
There aren't invariant high standards for knowledge, because even those can be raised [Cohen,S]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
19559
|
Contextualists slightly concede scepticism, but only in extremely strict contexts [Cohen,S]
|