Combining Philosophers
Ideas for H.Putnam/P.Oppenheim, Lucretius and Stewart Cohen
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
10 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / c. Empirical foundations
|
5697
|
The only possible standard for settling doubts is the foundation of the senses [Lucretius]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism
|
19558
|
Our own intuitions about whether we know tend to vacillate [Cohen,S]
|
|
19561
|
We shouldn't jump too quickly to a contextualist account of claims to know [Cohen,S]
|
|
19563
|
The context sensitivity of knowledge derives from its justification [Cohen,S]
|
|
19560
|
Contextualism is good because it allows knowledge, but bad because 'knowing' is less valued [Cohen,S]
|
|
12893
|
Contextualism says sceptical arguments are true, relative to their strict context [Cohen,S]
|
|
12896
|
Knowledge is context-sensitive, because justification is [Cohen,S]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / b. Invariantism
|
12894
|
There aren't invariant high standards for knowledge, because even those can be raised [Cohen,S]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 3. Illusion Scepticism
|
5727
|
Most supposed delusions of the senses are really misinterpretations by the mind [Lucretius]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
|
19559
|
Contextualists slightly concede scepticism, but only in extremely strict contexts [Cohen,S]
|