Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Jonathan Kvanvig, James Van Cleve and Michael J. Sandel
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
9 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 1. Justification / c. Defeasibility
19567
|
The 'defeasibility' approach says true justified belief is knowledge if no undermining facts could be known [Kvanvig]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 2. Justification Challenges / a. Agrippa's trilemma
8840
|
There are five possible responses to the problem of infinite regress in justification [Cleve]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 3. Internal or External / a. Pro-internalism
19679
|
'Access' internalism says responsibility needs access; weaker 'mentalism' needs mental justification [Kvanvig]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 1. Epistemic virtues
19730
|
Epistemic virtues: love of knowledge, courage, caution, autonomy, practical wisdom... [Kvanvig]
|
19731
|
If epistemic virtues are faculties or powers, that doesn't explain propositional knowledge [Kvanvig]
|
19732
|
The value of good means of attaining truth are swamped by the value of the truth itself [Kvanvig]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / a. Foundationalism
8841
|
Modern foundationalists say basic beliefs are fallible, and coherence is relevant [Cleve]
|
19678
|
Strong foundationalism needs strict inferences; weak version has induction, explanation, probability [Kvanvig]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 3. Reliabilism / b. Anti-reliabilism
19570
|
Reliabilism cannot assess the justification for propositions we don't believe [Kvanvig]
|