display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
4 ideas
19551 | How can we know the heavyweight implications of normal knowledge? Must we distort 'knowledge'? [Hawthorne] |
19552 | We wouldn't know the logical implications of our knowledge if small risks added up to big risks [Hawthorne] |
19554 | Denying closure is denying we know P when we know P and Q, which is absurd in simple cases [Hawthorne] |
8618 | Coherence is a justification if truth is its best explanation (not skill in creating fiction) [Elgin] |