Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Paul Bernays, Earl Conee and Jonathan Tallant
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
8 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 3. Reliabilism / b. Anti-reliabilism
|
19523
|
Reliabilism is poor on reflective judgements about hypothetical cases [Conee]
|
|
19521
|
If pure guesses were reliable, reliabilists would have to endorse them [Conee]
|
|
19522
|
More than actual reliability is needed, since I may mistakenly doubt what is reliable [Conee]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism
|
19555
|
People begin to doubt whether they 'know' when the answer becomes more significant [Conee]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / b. Invariantism
|
19557
|
Maybe low knowledge standards are loose talk; people will deny that it is 'really and truly' knowledge [Conee]
|
|
19556
|
Maybe knowledge has fixed standards (high, but attainable), although people apply contextual standards [Conee]
|
|
12890
|
That standards vary with context doesn't imply different truth-conditions for judgements [Conee]
|
|
12892
|
Maybe there is only one context (the 'really and truly' one) for serious discussions of knowledge [Conee]
|