Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Tim Bayne, Edmund L. Gettier and Timothy McGrew
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
10 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / a. Evidence
19687
|
Absence of evidence proves nothing, and weird claims need special evidence [McGrew]
|
19684
|
Does spotting a new possibility count as evidence? [McGrew]
|
17771
|
How we evaluate evidence depends on our background beliefs [Bayne]
|
19688
|
Every event is highly unlikely (in detail), but may be perfectly plausible [McGrew]
|
19686
|
Criminal law needs two separate witnesses, but historians will accept one witness [McGrew]
|
19680
|
Maybe all evidence consists of beliefs, rather than of facts [McGrew]
|
19681
|
If all evidence is propositional, what is the evidence for the proposition? Do we face a regress? [McGrew]
|
19689
|
Several unreliable witnesses can give good support, if they all say the same thing [McGrew]
|
17770
|
Clifford's dictum seems to block our beliefs in morality, politics and philosophy [Bayne]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / b. Evidentialism
19683
|
Narrow evidentialism relies wholly on propositions; the wider form includes other items [McGrew]
|