Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Anaxarchus, Susan A. Gelman and Melvin Fitting

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


3 ideas

14. Science / C. Induction / 1. Induction
Inductive success is rewarded with more induction [Gelman]
     Full Idea: Inductive success is rewarded with more induction.
     From: Susan A. Gelman (The Essential Child [2003], 11 'Broadening')
     A reaction: I love this one. Neat, accurate, and central to how we understand the world. I take inductive success to be stored as labels, concepts, categories, words and general truths, which are then our resource for further attempts.
14. Science / C. Induction / 3. Limits of Induction
Children overestimate the power of a single example [Gelman]
     Full Idea: We suggest that children overestimate the power of a single example.
     From: Susan A. Gelman (The Essential Child [2003], 06 'The role')
     A reaction: This conclusion arises from extensive psychological research. 'My grandma smoked, and she lived to be 97' - adults do this too. Wittgenstein says assuming other minds because of your own is induction from one example!
Children make errors in induction by focusing too much on categories [Gelman]
     Full Idea: Because of their narrow focus, children's sensitivity to categories as the basis of induction is a reasoning bias that, though useful much of the time, results in systematic errors.
     From: Susan A. Gelman (The Essential Child [2003], 06 'The role')
     A reaction: This is the bad sense of 'essentialism' which worries its opponents. Presumably, though, my favoured scientific essentialism will be 'scientific', and avoid this problem. The relation between categories and induction needs to be clear.