Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Stephen Mumford, Mark Rowlands and F.A. Hayek
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
7 ideas
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / a. Types of explanation
14319
|
Nomothetic explanations cite laws, and structural explanations cite mechanisms [Mumford]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / e. Lawlike explanations
14342
|
General laws depend upon the capacities of particulars, not the other way around [Mumford]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / k. Explanations by essence
14322
|
If fragile just means 'breaks when dropped', it won't explain a breakage [Mumford]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 3. Best Explanation / b. Ultimate explanation
14320
|
Subatomic particles may terminate explanation, if they lack structure [Mumford]
|
14337
|
Maybe dispositions can replace the 'laws of nature' as the basis of explanation [Mumford]
|
14343
|
To avoid a regress in explanations, ungrounded dispositions will always have to be posited [Mumford]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 4. Explanation Doubts / a. Explanation as pragmatic
14324
|
Ontology is unrelated to explanation, which concerns modes of presentation and states of knowledge [Mumford]
|