Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Archimedes, Alan Turing and Friedrich Nietzsche

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


8 ideas

16. Persons / F. Free Will / 5. Against Free Will
A thought comes when 'it' wants, not when 'I' want [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: A thought comes when 'it' wants, not when 'I' want.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Beyond Good and Evil [1886], §017)
     A reaction: A wonderful remark (which I have since found in Schopenhauer). I don't see how the most enthusiastic free will libertarian can deny it.
Wanting 'freedom of will' is wanting to pull oneself into existence out of the swamp of nothingness by one's own hair [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: The desire for 'freedom of will' is nothing less than the desire to pull oneself into existence out of the swamp of nothingness by one's own hair.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Beyond Good and Evil [1886], §021)
'Freedom of will' is the feeling of having a dominating force [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: It is our feeling of having more force that we call 'freedom of will', the consciousness of our force compelling in relation to a force that is compelled.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Writings from Late Notebooks [1887], 34[250])
     A reaction: I don't agree. That describes well how we experience the will, and develop the concept of a will, but the idea that the will is 'free' seems to me to be totally theoretical (and false), and doesn't derive from experience at all.
Philosophers invented "free will" so that our virtues would be permanently interesting to the gods [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: The philosophers invented "free will" - absolute human spontaneity in good and evil - to furnish a right to the idea that the interest of the gods in man, in human virtue, could never be exhausted.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (On the Genealogy of Morals [1887], II.§07)
     A reaction: Wonderfully outrageous suggestion! If we had true metaphysical 'absolute' free will, we would be much more interesting, and have a much higher status in the cosmos. Nietzsche is probably right.
16. Persons / F. Free Will / 6. Determinism / a. Determinism
People used to think that outcomes were from God, rather than consequences of acts [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: People used to believe that the outcome of an action was not a consequence, but an independent, supplemental ingredient, namely God's. Is a greater confusion conceivable?
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Dawn (Daybreak) [1881], 012)
     A reaction: Not sure how well documented or accurate this is, but Nietzsche was a great scholar, and it would explain the fatalism that runs through many older forms of society.
That all events are necessary does not mean they are compelled [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: The absolute necessity of all events contains nothing of a compulsion.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1885-86 [1886], 1[114])
     A reaction: I like to look for necessity-makers behind necessities. So if the event is not necessary because of its cause, where does it come from? Is it that the whole sequence is a unified necessity?
16. Persons / F. Free Will / 6. Determinism / b. Fate
I have perfected fatalism, as recurrence and denial of the will [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: I have perfected fatalism, through eternal recurrence and preexistence, and through the elimination of the concept 'will'.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1884-85 [1884], 25[214])
     A reaction: 'Amor fati' - love of fate - was his oft repeated slogan. We can all understand 'go with the flow', but I'm not sure about anything more universal than that.
Fate is inspiring, if you understand you are part of it [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: Fate is an inspiring thought for those who understand that they are part of it.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1884-85 [1884], 26[442])
     A reaction: Sounds a bit like the Niagara Falls being inspiring if you are being swept over it. I find the possibility of fatalism neutral, rather than inspiring.