Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Lynch,MP/Glasgow,JM, John Locke and Theophrastus

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


4 ideas

16. Persons / F. Free Will / 1. Nature of Free Will
We are free to decide not to follow our desires [Locke]
     Full Idea: We have a power to suspend the prosecution of this or that desire; as everyone daily may experiment in himself. This seems to me the source of all liberty, ..which is (as I think improperly) call'd 'free will'.
     From: John Locke (Essay Conc Human Understanding (2nd Ed) [1694], 2.21.47)
     A reaction: This strikes me as a feeble defence of free will, since we have no idea of the origin of the decision not to act according to some desire. I see no sign of free will in introspection, despite what some people claim.
16. Persons / F. Free Will / 5. Against Free Will
Men are not free to will, because they cannot help willing [Locke]
     Full Idea: A man is not at liberty to will or not to will, because he cannot forbear willing.
     From: John Locke (Essay Conc Human Understanding (2nd Ed) [1694], 2.21.24)
     A reaction: Not quite an answer to the big problem, but an interesting observation for those who have high hopes of a truly, deeply and extensively free will.
16. Persons / F. Free Will / 7. Compatibilism
Liberty is a power of agents, so can't be an attribute of wills [Locke]
     Full Idea: Liberty, which is but a power, belongs only to agents, and cannot be an attribute or modification of the will, which is also but a power.
     From: John Locke (Essay Conc Human Understanding (2nd Ed) [1694], 2.21.14)
     A reaction: He is suggesting the 'free will' is a category mistake, but why shouldn't a power have a power? Magnetism can be strong, or focused. He is ducking the question of what ultimately controls the will.
A man is free insofar as he can act according to his own preferences [Locke]
     Full Idea: So far as his power reaches, of acting or not acting, by the determination of his own thought preferring either, so far is a man free. ..We can scarcely imagine any being freer, than to be able to do what he wills.
     From: John Locke (Essay Conc Human Understanding (2nd Ed) [1694], 2.21.21)
     A reaction: It take this approach, which Hume echoes, to be ducking the metaphysical problem, of where the act of willing originates. Locke goes on to admit this.