22354
|
Things cause perceptions, properties have other effects, hence we reach a 'view from nowhere' [Nagel, by Reiss/Sprenger]
|
|
Full Idea:
First we realise that perceptions are caused by things, second we realise that properties have other effects (as well as causing perceptions), and third we conceive of a thing's true nature without perspectives. That is the 'view from nowhere'.
|
|
From:
report of Thomas Nagel (The View from Nowhere [1986], p.14) by Reiss,J/Spreger,J - Scientific Objectivity 2.1
|
|
A reaction:
[My summary of their summary] This is obviously an optimistic view. I''m not sure how he can justify three precise stages, given than animals probably jump straight to the third stage, and engage with the nature's of things.
|
20389
|
A definition of a thing gives all the requirements which add up to a guarantee of it [Davies,S]
|
|
Full Idea:
If we specify the 'necessary' conditions that are 'sufficient' for something's being an X, that is a combination of conditions such that all and only Xs meet them, which is the hallmark of a definition of X-hood.
|
|
From:
Stephen Davies (The Philosophy of Art (2nd ed) [2016], 2.1)
|
|
A reaction:
There are, of course, many other ways to define something, as shown in the 2.D Reason | Definition section of this database. This nicely summarises the classical view.
|
20391
|
Feminists warn that ideologies use timeless objective definitions as a tool of repression [Davies,S]
|
|
Full Idea:
According to the feminist critique, ideologies that operate as tools of political repression are falsely represented as definitions possessing a timeless, natural, asocial, universal objectivity.
|
|
From:
Stephen Davies (The Philosophy of Art (2nd ed) [2016], 2.2)
|
|
A reaction:
I suppose this does not just apply to definitions, but to all expressions of ideologically repressive strategy. I'm trying to think of an example of a specifically feminist problem case. Davies doesn't cite anyone.
|