Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Chilo, PG and David Roochnik
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
14 ideas
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 2. Logos
1571
|
'Logos' ranges from thought/reasoning, to words, to rational structures outside thought [Roochnik]
|
1572
|
In the seventeenth century the only acceptable form of logos was technical knowledge [Roochnik]
|
1573
|
The hallmark of a person with logos is that they give reasons why one opinion is superior to another [Roochnik]
|
1592
|
Logos cannot refute the relativist, and so must admit that it too is a matter of desire (for truth and agreement) [Roochnik]
|
1593
|
Human desire has an ordered structure, with logos at the pinnacle [Roochnik]
|
1603
|
Logos is not unconditionally good, but good if there is another person willing to engage with it [Roochnik]
|
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 4. Aims of Reason
1598
|
We prefer reason or poetry according to whether basics are intelligible or not [Roochnik]
|
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 8. Naturalising Reason
1584
|
Modern science, by aiming for clarity about the external world, has abandoned rationality in the human world [Roochnik]
|
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 9. Limits of Reason
1599
|
Attempts to suspend all presuppositions are hopeless, because a common ground must be agreed for the process [Roochnik]
|
1591
|
Unfortunately for reason, argument can't be used to establish the value of argument [Roochnik]
|
2. Reason / F. Fallacies / 1. Fallacy
4686
|
Fallacies are errors in reasoning, 'formal' if a clear rule is breached, and 'informal' if more general [PG]
|
2. Reason / F. Fallacies / 3. Question Begging
7415
|
Question-begging assumes the proposition which is being challenged [PG]
|
2. Reason / F. Fallacies / 6. Fallacy of Division
7414
|
What is true of a set is also true of its members [PG]
|
2. Reason / F. Fallacies / 7. Ad Hominem
6696
|
The Ad Hominem Fallacy criticises the speaker rather than the argument [PG]
|