Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Hermarchus, Willard Quine and Immanuel Kant

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


7 ideas

22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 1. Goodness / g. Consequentialism
A good will is not good because of what it achieves [Kant]
     Full Idea: A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes.
     From: Immanuel Kant (Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals [1785], 394.3)
     A reaction: This invites the obvious objection of the well-meaning fool, who causes misery despite meaning well. I firmly hold the view that what matters is what we do, not what we intend.
The good of an action is in the mind of the doer, not the consequences [Kant]
     Full Idea: What is essentially good in an action consists in the mental disposition, let the consequences be what they may.
     From: Immanuel Kant (Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals [1785], 416.43)
     A reaction: Dreadful idea. I always claim that consequences are relevant in Kant, in formulating and choosing maxims for action, but this idea seems to refute my view. This is a slogan for the Spanish Inquisition.
Morality involves duty and respect for law, not love of the outcome [Kant]
     Full Idea: All the morality of actions may be placed in their necessity from duty and from respect for the law, and not from love for or leaning toward that which the action is to produce.
     From: Immanuel Kant (Critique of Practical Reason [1788], I.1.III)
     A reaction: Kant tries to reject consequentialism, but you cannot assess your duty or the universal law without an assessment of probable consequences, and we could never choose between laws if we did not already see value in the outcome.
22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 2. Happiness / a. Nature of happiness
Our happiness is all that matters, not as a sensation, but as satisfaction with our whole existence [Kant]
     Full Idea: Our happiness is the only thing of importance, provided this is judged, as reason requires, not according to transitory sensation but according to the influence which this contingency has on our whole existence and our satisfaction with it.
     From: Immanuel Kant (Critique of Practical Reason [1788], I.1.II)
     A reaction: This is closer to the Greek eudaimonia than to the modern conception of happiness, which is largely just a feeling. Kant's view seems more like a private judgement on your whole life, where the Greek idea seems more public and objective.
Happiness is the condition of a rational being for whom everything goes as they wish [Kant]
     Full Idea: Happiness is the condition of a rational being in the world with whom everything goes according to his wish and will.
     From: Immanuel Kant (Critique of Practical Reason [1788], I.II.II.V)
     A reaction: For such a sophisticated and rational philosopher this seems a rather crude notion. Reluctant alcoholics don't fit. Bradley has a much better definition (Idea 5655).
22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 2. Happiness / c. Value of happiness
Morality is not about making ourselves happy, but about being worthy of happiness [Kant]
     Full Idea: Morality is not properly the doctrine of how we should make ourselves happy, but how we should become worthy of happiness.
     From: Immanuel Kant (Critique of Practical Reason [1788], I.II.II.V)
     A reaction: Whatever else you think of Kant's moral theory, this remark is a clarion call we can all recognise. Suppose we all somehow ended up in a state of maximal happiness by systematically betraying one another.
Duty does not aim at an end, but gives rise to universal happiness as aim of the will [Kant]
     Full Idea: My conception of duty does not need to be based on any particular end, but rather itself occasions a new end for the human will, that of striving with all one's power towards the highest good possible on earth, the universal happiness of the whole world.
     From: Immanuel Kant (True in Theory, but not in Practice [1792], 1B)
     A reaction: I see nothing in the categorical imperative that demands 'all one's power', and nothing that specifies happiness as what has to be universalised. Nietzsche, for one, thinks happiness is overrated.