Combining Philosophers
Ideas for David O. Brink, Francis Hutcheson and Jason Crease
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
12 ideas
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / c. Ethical intuitionism
6238
|
We approve of actions by a superior moral sense [Hutcheson]
|
6239
|
We dislike a traitor, even if they give us great benefit [Hutcheson]
|
6240
|
The moral sense is not an innate idea, but an ability to approve or disapprove in a disinterested way [Hutcheson]
|
6242
|
We cannot choose our moral feelings, otherwise bribery could affect them [Hutcheson]
|
6247
|
Everyone feels uneasy when seeing others in pain, unless the others are evil [Hutcheson]
|
6256
|
Can't the moral sense make mistakes, as the other senses do? [Hutcheson]
|
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / h. Expressivism
2848
|
Two people might agree in their emotional moral attitude while disagreeing in their judgement [Brink]
|
2851
|
Emotivists find it hard to analyse assertions of moral principles, rather than actual judgements [Brink]
|
2853
|
Emotivists claim to explain moral motivation by basing morality on non-cognitive attitudes [Brink]
|
2852
|
Emotivists tend to favour a redundancy theory of truth, making moral judgement meaningless [Brink]
|
2849
|
Emotivism implies relativism about moral meanings, but critics say disagreements are about moral reference [Brink]
|
2850
|
How can emotivists explain someone who recognises morality but is indifferent to it? [Brink]
|