Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Eucleides, Jonathan Dancy and G.E. Moore
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
11 ideas
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / b. Defining ethics
8039
|
Moore tries to show that 'good' is indefinable, but doesn't understand what a definition is [MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
|
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / a. Idealistic ethics
22151
|
The Open Question argument leads to anti-realism and the fact-value distinction [Boulter on Moore,GE]
|
11056
|
The naturalistic fallacy claims that natural qualties can define 'good' [Moore,GE]
|
8033
|
Moore cannot show why something being good gives us a reason for action [MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
|
8032
|
Can learning to recognise a good friend help us to recognise a good watch? [MacIntyre on Moore,GE]
|
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / c. Ethical intuitionism
11050
|
Moore's combination of antinaturalism with strong supervenience on the natural is incoherent [Hanna on Moore,GE]
|
23726
|
Despite Moore's caution, non-naturalists incline towards intuitionism [Moore,GE, by Smith,M]
|
7260
|
If there are intuited moral facts, why should we care about them? [Dancy,J]
|
7261
|
Internalists say that moral intuitions are motivating; externalist say a desire is also needed [Dancy,J]
|
7262
|
Obviously judging an action as wrong gives us a reason not to do it [Dancy,J]
|
7265
|
Moral facts are not perceived facts, but perceived reasons for judgements [Dancy,J]
|