Combining Philosophers
Ideas for William James, David O. Brink and Oliver,A/Smiley,T
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
7 ideas
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / d. Biological ethics
|
22660
|
Evolution suggests prevailing or survival as a new criterion of right and wrong [James]
|
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / h. Expressivism
|
2848
|
Two people might agree in their emotional moral attitude while disagreeing in their judgement [Brink]
|
|
2851
|
Emotivists find it hard to analyse assertions of moral principles, rather than actual judgements [Brink]
|
|
2853
|
Emotivists claim to explain moral motivation by basing morality on non-cognitive attitudes [Brink]
|
|
2852
|
Emotivists tend to favour a redundancy theory of truth, making moral judgement meaningless [Brink]
|
|
2849
|
Emotivism implies relativism about moral meanings, but critics say disagreements are about moral reference [Brink]
|
|
2850
|
How can emotivists explain someone who recognises morality but is indifferent to it? [Brink]
|