display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
2 ideas
4670 | Being alive is not intrinsically good, and there is no 'right to life' [Glover] |
Full Idea: There is nothing intrinsically good in a person being alive, and the idea of a 'right to life' should be rejected. | |
From: Jonathan Glover (Causing Death and Saving Lives [1977], §11.1) | |
A reaction: If pleasure or benefit can be intrinsically good, I don't see why life can't be. The notion of a 'natural' or 'self-evident' right does look dubious to me. Rights are earned and given. Robinson Crusoe has no rights. |
4668 | You can't have a right to something you can't desire, so a foetus has no 'right' to life [Glover] |
Full Idea: It seems that the bearers of rights must at least have the capacity to desire what they have a right to, which is something the foetus does not have. | |
From: Jonathan Glover (Causing Death and Saving Lives [1977], §9.4) | |
A reaction: Obviously we could say a person has a right to something they don't desire (such as freedom). How about: a mental defective has the right not to be laughed at, even if they don't understand the mockery? |