Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Lynch,MP/Glasgow,JM, Lawrence Kohlberg and Simone Weil

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


4 ideas

25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 1. Basis of Rights
Giving centrality to rights stifles all impulses of charity [Weil]
     Full Idea: To place the notion of rights at the centre of social conflicts is to inhibit any possible impulse of charity on both sides.
     From: Simone Weil (Human Personality [1943], p.83)
     A reaction: I think she exaggerates. To place personal charity at the centre of social conflicts strikes me as extremely conservative, and unlikely to improve the situation very much. I'm unsure how to reconcile this with Idea 23750. What sort of charity?
People have duties, and only have rights because of the obligations of others to them [Weil]
     Full Idea: A right is effectual only in relation to its corresponding obligation, springing not from the individual who possesses it, but from others who consider themselves under an obligation to him. In isolation a man only has duties, and only others have rights.
     From: Simone Weil (The Need for Roots [1943], I 'Needs')
     A reaction: This seems correct, and obviously refutes the idea that people have intrinsic natural rights. However, it may be our sense of what nature requires which gives rise to the obligations we feel towards others.
Rights are asserted contentiously, and need the backing of force [Weil]
     Full Idea: Rights are always asserted in a tone of contention; and when this tone is adopted, it must rely upon force in the background, or else it will be laughed at.
     From: Simone Weil (Human Personality [1943], p.81)
     A reaction: This is the sort of observation which leads on to Foucault's account of all-pervasive power. Her observation may not be so sinister. It is obvious that introductions of new rights go against the grain of a conservative society - and so need a push.
25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 4. Property rights
People need personal and collective property, and a social class lacking property is shameful [Weil]
     Full Idea: The human soul has need of both personal property and collective property. …The existence of a social class defined by the lack of personal and collective property is as shameful as slavery.
     From: Simone Weil (Draft Statement of Human Obligations [1943], p.229)
     A reaction: Nice. Particularly the idea that we all need collective property, such as parks and beaches and public buildings.