display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
2 ideas
15997 | We are so far from understanding the workings of natural bodies that it is pointless to even try [Locke] |
Full Idea: As to a perfect science of natural bodies (not to mention spiritual beings) we are, I think, so far from being capable of any such thing, that I conclude it lost labour to seek after it. | |
From: John Locke (Essay Conc Human Understanding (2nd Ed) [1694], 4.03.28) | |
A reaction: It seems to me that Locke has an excellent grasp of the nature of science, except for his extraordinary and misjudged pessimism about what it might achieve. |
15978 | I take 'matter' to be a body, excluding its extension in space and its shape [Locke] |
Full Idea: 'Matter' is a partial and more confused conception, it seeming to me to be used for the substance and solidity of body, without taking in its extension and figure. | |
From: John Locke (Essay Conc Human Understanding (2nd Ed) [1694], 3.10.15) | |
A reaction: The 'without taking in' I take to mean that matter is an abstraction (of the psychological kind) from the character of physical bodies. Matter does not exist without having an extension and figure. |