Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Donald Davidson, Peter F. Strawson and L.A. Paul
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
11 ideas
3. Truth / F. Semantic Truth / 1. Tarski's Truth / a. Tarski's truth definition
10844
|
The statement that it is raining perfectly fits the fact that it is raining [Strawson,P]
|
3. Truth / F. Semantic Truth / 1. Tarski's Truth / b. Satisfaction and truth
19145
|
We can explain truth in terms of satisfaction - but also explain satisfaction in terms of truth [Davidson]
|
19146
|
Satisfaction is a sort of reference, so maybe we can define truth in terms of reference? [Davidson]
|
19174
|
Axioms spell out sentence satisfaction. With no free variables, all sequences satisfy the truths [Davidson]
|
3. Truth / F. Semantic Truth / 1. Tarski's Truth / c. Meta-language for truth
23288
|
When Tarski defines truth for different languages, how do we know it is a single concept? [Davidson]
|
23297
|
The language to define truth needs a finite vocabulary, to make the definition finite [Davidson]
|
3. Truth / F. Semantic Truth / 2. Semantic Truth
10841
|
The word 'true' always refers to a possible statement [Strawson,P]
|
19136
|
Many say that Tarski's definitions fail to connect truth to meaning [Davidson]
|
19139
|
Tarski does not tell us what his various truth predicates have in common [Davidson]
|
19147
|
Truth is the basic concept, because Convention-T is agreed to fix the truths of a language [Davidson]
|
19172
|
To define a class of true sentences is to stipulate a possible language [Davidson]
|