Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Bertrand Russell, R.D. Ingthorsson and Michael J. Sandel
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
26 ideas
4. Formal Logic / A. Syllogistic Logic / 2. Syllogistic Logic
5401
|
The mortality of Socrates is more certain from induction than it is from deduction [Russell]
|
14453
|
The Darapti syllogism is fallacious: All M is S, all M is P, so some S is P' - but if there is no M? [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / C. Predicate Calculus PC / 2. Tools of Predicate Calculus / e. Existential quantifier ∃
16484
|
There are four experiences that lead us to talk of 'some' things [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 3. Types of Set / b. Empty (Null) Set
14113
|
The null class is a fiction [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 3. Types of Set / c. Unit (Singleton) Sets
6103
|
Normally a class with only one member is a problem, because the class and the member are identical [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 3. Types of Set / d. Infinite Sets
14427
|
We can enumerate finite classes, but an intensional definition is needed for infinite classes [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / b. Axiom of Extensionality I
14428
|
Members define a unique class, whereas defining characteristics are numerous [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / f. Axiom of Infinity V
14440
|
We may assume that there are infinite collections, as there is no logical reason against them [Russell]
|
14447
|
Infinity says 'for any inductive cardinal, there is a class having that many terms' [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / j. Axiom of Choice IX
14443
|
The British parliament has one representative selected from each constituency [Russell]
|
14445
|
Choice shows that if any two cardinals are not equal, one must be the greater [Russell]
|
14444
|
Choice is equivalent to the proposition that every class is well-ordered [Russell]
|
14446
|
We can pick all the right or left boots, but socks need Choice to insure the representative class [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / p. Axiom of Reducibility
18130
|
Axiom of Reducibility: there is always a function of the lowest possible order in a given level [Russell, by Bostock]
|
14459
|
Reducibility: a family of functions is equivalent to a single type of function [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 5. Conceptions of Set / c. Logical sets
21563
|
The 'no classes' theory says the propositions just refer to the members [Russell]
|
14461
|
Propositions about classes can be reduced to propositions about their defining functions [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 5. Conceptions of Set / d. Naïve logical sets
15894
|
Russell invented the naïve set theory usually attributed to Cantor [Russell, by Lavine]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 6. Ordering in Sets
14126
|
Order rests on 'between' and 'separation' [Russell]
|
14127
|
Order depends on transitive asymmetrical relations [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 7. Natural Sets
8469
|
Russell's proposal was that only meaningful predicates have sets as their extensions [Russell, by Orenstein]
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 8. Critique of Set Theory
11064
|
Classes can be reduced to propositional functions [Russell, by Hanna]
|
7548
|
Classes, grouped by a convenient property, are logical constructions [Russell]
|
8745
|
Classes are logical fictions, and are not part of the ultimate furniture of the world [Russell]
|
6436
|
I gradually replaced classes with properties, and they ended as a symbolic convenience [Russell]
|
4. Formal Logic / G. Formal Mereology / 1. Mereology
14121
|
The part-whole relation is ultimate and indefinable [Russell]
|