Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Stilpo, James Robert Brown and Geoffrey Hellman
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
11 ideas
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 2. Proof in Mathematics
9646
|
There is no limit to how many ways something can be proved in mathematics [Brown,JR]
|
9647
|
Computers played an essential role in proving the four-colour theorem of maps [Brown,JR]
|
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 6. Mathematics as Set Theory / b. Mathematics is not set theory
9643
|
Set theory may represent all of mathematics, without actually being mathematics [Brown,JR]
|
9644
|
When graphs are defined set-theoretically, that won't cover unlabelled graphs [Brown,JR]
|
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 7. Mathematical Structuralism / a. Structuralism
8921
|
Structuralism is now common, studying relations, with no regard for what the objects might be [Hellman]
|
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 7. Mathematical Structuralism / c. Nominalist structuralism
8698
|
Modal structuralism says mathematics studies possible structures, which may or may not be actualised [Hellman, by Friend]
|
9557
|
Statements of pure mathematics are elliptical for a sort of modal conditional [Hellman, by Chihara]
|
10263
|
Modal structuralism can only judge possibility by 'possible' models [Shapiro on Hellman]
|
8922
|
Maybe mathematical objects only have structural roles, and no intrinsic nature [Hellman]
|
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 7. Mathematical Structuralism / d. Platonist structuralism
9625
|
To see a structure in something, we must already have the idea of the structure [Brown,JR]
|
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 7. Mathematical Structuralism / e. Structuralism critique
9628
|
Sets seem basic to mathematics, but they don't suit structuralism [Brown,JR]
|