display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
3 ideas
21449 | The a priori concept of objects in general is the ground of experience [Kant] |
Full Idea: Concepts of objects in general lie at the ground of all experiential cognition as a priori conditions. | |
From: Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason [1781], B126/A93) | |
A reaction: Does Kant have an a priori insight that process philosophy, or philosophy based entirely on relations, are wrong? |
16232 | An object is 'natural' if its stages are linked by certain non-supervenient relations [Hawley] |
Full Idea: I suggest that our distinction between natural and unnatural (gerrymandered) objects corresponds to a distinction between series of stages which are and are not linked by certain non-supervenient relations. | |
From: Katherine Hawley (How Things Persist [2001], 5.5) | |
A reaction: See Idea 16213 for the nature of these 'relations'. I don't understand how an abstraction (as I take it) like a relation can unify a physical object. A trout-turkey is unified by a relation of some sort. Hawley defends Stage Theory. |
5533 | Objects in themselves are not known to us at all [Kant] |
Full Idea: Objects in themselves are not known to us at all. | |
From: Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason [1781], B045/A30) | |
A reaction: It is the phrase "at all" which is interesting. It suggests that Kant is in no way a representative realist, though it is hard to place him within the labels of phenomenalism/idealism/anti-realism. |