Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Lynch,MP/Glasgow,JM, Brad W. Hooker and Robert Pasnau

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers


24 ideas

9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / a. Individuation
Scholastics say there is a genuine thing if it is 'separable' [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Among the scholastics (after Duns Scotus) it would be come to be taken for granted that the crucial test for being a genuine thing - a 'res' - is separability.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 11.2)
     A reaction: The idea of separability is implicit in Aristotle. In borderline cases, it seems that they are tempted to claim that things like accidental properties are separable, simply because they want them to be genuine things. A criterion for separability?
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / b. Individuation by properties
If you reject essences, questions of individuation become extremely difficult [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Given the accepted linkage between a thing's essence and its identity, the rejection of essences makes a complete mess out of questions of individuation.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 27.6)
     A reaction: I note that he talks of a thing having 'identity', contra the view of identity as a two-place relation. I agree with this, but there is a chicken-egg problem. Do I perceive an identity and surmise an essence, or surmise an essence and deduce identity?
Scholastics thought Quantity could be the principle of individuation [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Quantity was a leading scholastic contender for the principle of individuation.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 14.4)
9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 2. Substance / a. Substance
Corpuscularianism promised a decent account of substance [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: One of the great attractions of corpuscularianism is that it promises to put our acquaintance with substances on a solid foundation.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 07.3)
     A reaction: This is why the seventeenth century did not abandon 'substance', even though they banished 'substantial form'.
Corpuscularian critics of scholasticism say only substances exist [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Corpuscularian critics of scholasticism tend to think that only substances exist.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 06.2)
     A reaction: Pasnau treats this as an extreme 17th C reaction which was hopelessly inadequate as metaphysics. We have been struggling with the nature of 'properties' ever since, while losing our grip on the concept of a unified 'substance'.
Scholastics wanted to treat Aristotelianism as physics, rather than as metaphysics [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: There is a broad scholastic tendency to understand Aristotelianism not in abstract, metaphysical terms, but as a concrete, physical theory of the world.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 23.5)
     A reaction: This seems to give a good explanation of why Aristotelianism plummeted to oblivion in the 17th C. Pasnau obviously wants to revive it, by drawing a sharp line between metaphysics and science. I doubt the line.
If crowds are things at all, they seem to be Substances, since they bear properties [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Crowds seem to be the bearers of properties, and if they are things at all, then there is no place for them other than in the category of Substance.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 26.1)
     A reaction: It is tempting to say, based on Aristotle, that a substance is whatever 1) bears properties, and 2) endures in spite of change, but a crowd is a nice problem case, because it looks too disunited to be a 'substance'.
9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 2. Substance / c. Types of substance
Scholastics use 'substantia' for thick concrete entities, and for thin metaphysical ones [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Scholastic texts are rife with different senses of 'substantia', using the term to refer, among other things, both to thick concrete entities and to thin metaphysical ones.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 06.1)
     A reaction: Pasnau introduces 'thin' and 'thick' substance for this reason. I may adopt this. Without distinctions between thin and thick concepts of things we can get very muddled. I like the word to label something which is an 'entity'.
9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 2. Substance / e. Substance critique
For corpuscularians, a substance is just its integral parts [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: According to strict corpuscularianism the only real constituents of a substance are its integral parts.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 26.1)
     A reaction: An understandable reaction to the emptiness of Aristotelian substantial forms in science. It seems to leave out the structural principles that distinguish one arrangement of parts from another. See Koslicki on this.
9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 3. Unity Problems / c. Statue and clay
If clay survives destruction of the statue, the statue wasn't a substance, but a mere accident [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: The unitarian view of substance says it cannot be divided. If the clay can survive the destruction of the statue, then that shows that the statue was not a substance at all, and that its shape (or whatever made it a statue) was merely a passing accident.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 25.3)
     A reaction: This seems to give the orthodox Aristotelian/Thomist reading, assuming that a substance only has one form, which unifies it. Since clay must have shape, and statues must have matter, I have never understood how there were two objects here.
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 2. Hylomorphism / a. Hylomorphism
Corpuscularianism rejected not only form, but also the dependence of matter on form [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: What marks the rise of the corpuscularian movement is not just the rejection of form, but the rejection of matter as dependent on form.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 04.5)
     A reaction: The point was that matter required form to have any kind of actual existence, but now matter can stand on its own.
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 2. Hylomorphism / b. Form as principle
Hylomorphism may not be a rival to science, but an abstract account of unity and endurance [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Hylomorphism admits of an alternative formulation, as an explanatory schema at a different level of analysis, not competing with corpuscular-mechanistic theory, but accounting for abstract features of the world - notably unity and endurance of substances.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 06.1)
     A reaction: Pasnau is clearly sympathetic. As a view of why normal objects have unity and persist over time it is almost the only decent theory around. Hawley, for example, struggles to explain how 'stages' of a thing are linked. Classical mereology is silly.
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 2. Hylomorphism / c. Form as causal
Hylomorphism declined because scholastics made it into a testable physical theory [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Scholastics lost their grip on hylomorphism as a metaphysical theory, conceiving of it as a concrete, physical hypothesis about causal forces. Once form and matter were made subject to empirical research, their days were inevitably numbered.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 06.1)
     A reaction: Pasnau seems to make a sharp distinction between science, and a separate realm he labels 'metaphysical'. You can't keep causation out of Aristotelian hylomorphism. The defence is that it is at a higher level of generality than science.
Scholastics made forms substantial, in a way unintended by Aristotle [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: The conception of form as somehow substantial took on new life among scholastic Aristotelians, and was developed in ways that Aristotle himself never suggested.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 24.1)
     A reaction: This is music to we modern neo-Aristotelians, because scholasticism was rightly dumped in the 17th C, but we can go back and start again from what The Philosopher actually said.
Scholastics began to see substantial form more as Aristotle's 'efficient' cause [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: The whole scholastic conception of substantial form came to have more and more in common with an Aristotelian efficient cause.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 24.2)
     A reaction: Aristotle, of course, identified the form with the 'formal cause [aitia]', which is the shape of the statue, rather than the efficient cause, which is the sculptor.
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 2. Hylomorphism / d. Form as unifier
Aquinas says a substance has one form; Scotists say it has many forms [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: Aquinas subscribes to the unitarian doctrine that a single substance has just a single substantial form, but authors like Scotus subscribe to a plurality of substantial forms.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 24.1)
     A reaction: The Scotists seem to think that qualities themselve can have forms. I take it that Aristotle would have agreed with Aquinas.
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 4. Quantity of an Object
Scholastic Quantity either gives a body parts, or spreads them out in a unified way [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: On one version of Quantity realism it is what makes a body have parts; on another version, it is what makes the body's parts be spread out in a continuous and unified way.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 14.1)
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 7. Substratum
There may be different types of substrate, or temporary substrates [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: The substratum thesis says …perhaps there is a different subject for different kinds of changes, and perhaps what endures through one kind of change will be corrupted by another.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 02.5)
A substratum can't be 'bare', because it has a job to do [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: A completely bare substratum seems not just incoherent but also unable to carry out the function for which it is intended - to be a substratum.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 03.3)
If a substrate gives causal support for change, quite a lot of the ingredients must endure [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: When the substratum thesis is grounded on the idea that the ingredients must endure through the change, if they are to play a causal role, then it is natural to suppose that quite a lot of the ingredients must endure.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 02.5)
     A reaction: Aristotle sharply distinguishes alteration from substantial change, but as the substrate gets thinner, the boundary between those two would blur.
A substrate may be 'prime matter', which endures through every change [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: The 'conservation thesis' about substrates says that there is a single, most basic substrate that endures through every material change, something we call 'prime matter'.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 02.5)
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 7. Essence and Necessity / b. Essence not necessities
Aristotelians deny that all necessary properties are essential [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: For an Aristotelian not all necessary properties are essential; the essential properties are those that define a thing as what it is.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 24.1)
     A reaction: I take it as basic that whatever is essential is in some way important, whereas necessities can be trivial.
9. Objects / E. Objects over Time / 6. Successive Things
Typical successive things are time and motion [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: The standard scholastic examples of 'entia successiva' are time and motion.
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 18.1)
     A reaction: Aristotle's examples of a day and the Games seem clearer, as time and motion do not count so clearly as 'things'.
9. Objects / E. Objects over Time / 10. Beginning of an Object
Weak ex nihilo says it all comes from something; strong version says the old must partly endure [Pasnau]
     Full Idea: The weak ex nihilo principle says that everything comes from something, and the strong ex nihilo principle says that in everything new, something of the old must endure
     From: Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 02.5)