Combining Philosophers

All the ideas for Anaxarchus, Daniel M. Mittag and Samuel Scheffler

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these philosophers

---

6 ideas

13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / b. Evidentialism

19722

We could know the evidence for our belief without knowing why it is such evidence [Mittag]

19723

Evidentialism can't explain that we accept knowledge claims if the evidence is forgotten [Mittag]

19720

Evidentialism concerns the evidence for the proposition, not for someone to believe it [Mittag]

13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / c. Coherentism critique

19721

Coherence theories struggle with the role of experience [Mittag]

13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 1. Scepticism

3061	Anaxarchus said that he was not even sure that he knew nothing [Anaxarchus, by Diog. Laertius]

22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 1. Goodness / g. Consequentialism

22457

If the aim is good outcomes, why are killings worse than deaths? [Scheffler, by Foot]