9 ideas
15312 | We get the idea of power by abstracting from ropes, magnets and electric shocks [Priestley] |
6587 | It is always wrong to believe things on insufficient evidence [Clifford] |
2848 | Two people might agree in their emotional moral attitude while disagreeing in their judgement [Brink] |
2851 | Emotivists find it hard to analyse assertions of moral principles, rather than actual judgements [Brink] |
2853 | Emotivists claim to explain moral motivation by basing morality on non-cognitive attitudes [Brink] |
2852 | Emotivists tend to favour a redundancy theory of truth, making moral judgement meaningless [Brink] |
2849 | Emotivism implies relativism about moral meanings, but critics say disagreements are about moral reference [Brink] |
2850 | How can emotivists explain someone who recognises morality but is indifferent to it? [Brink] |
15311 | Attraction or repulsion are not imparted to matter, but actually constitute it [Priestley] |