64 ideas
| 9955 | Contextual definitions replace a complete sentence containing the expression [George/Velleman] |
| 10031 | Impredicative definitions quantify over the thing being defined [George/Velleman] |
| 17926 | Rejecting double negation elimination undermines reductio proofs [Colyvan] |
| 17925 | Showing a disproof is impossible is not a proof, so don't eliminate double negation [Colyvan] |
| 10098 | The 'power set' of A is all the subsets of A [George/Velleman] |
| 10099 | The 'ordered pair' <a, b>, for two sets a and b, is the set {{a, b},{a}} [George/Velleman] |
| 10101 |
Cartesian Product A x B: the set of all ordered pairs |
| 10103 | Grouping by property is common in mathematics, usually using equivalence [George/Velleman] |
| 10104 | 'Equivalence' is a reflexive, symmetric and transitive relation; 'same first letter' partitions English words [George/Velleman] |
| 10096 | Even the elements of sets in ZFC are sets, resting on the pure empty set [George/Velleman] |
| 10097 | Axiom of Extensionality: for all sets x and y, if x and y have the same elements then x = y [George/Velleman] |
| 10100 | Axiom of Pairing: for all sets x and y, there is a set z containing just x and y [George/Velleman] |
| 17900 | The Axiom of Reducibility made impredicative definitions possible [George/Velleman] |
| 10109 | ZFC can prove that there is no set corresponding to the concept 'set' [George/Velleman] |
| 10108 | As a reduction of arithmetic, set theory is not fully general, and so not logical [George/Velleman] |
| 10111 | Asserting Excluded Middle is a hallmark of realism about the natural world [George/Velleman] |
| 17924 | Excluded middle says P or not-P; bivalence says P is either true or false [Colyvan] |
| 10129 | A 'model' is a meaning-assignment which makes all the axioms true [George/Velleman] |
| 10105 | Differences between isomorphic structures seem unimportant [George/Velleman] |
| 17929 | Löwenheim proved his result for a first-order sentence, and Skolem generalised it [Colyvan] |
| 17930 | Axioms are 'categorical' if all of their models are isomorphic [Colyvan] |
| 10119 | Consistency is a purely syntactic property, unlike the semantic property of soundness [George/Velleman] |
| 10126 | A 'consistent' theory cannot contain both a sentence and its negation [George/Velleman] |
| 10120 | Soundness is a semantic property, unlike the purely syntactic property of consistency [George/Velleman] |
| 10127 | A 'complete' theory contains either any sentence or its negation [George/Velleman] |
| 21554 | Sets always exceed terms, so all the sets must exceed all the sets [Lackey] |
| 21553 | It seems that the ordinal number of all the ordinals must be bigger than itself [Lackey] |
| 10106 | Rational numbers give answers to division problems with integers [George/Velleman] |
| 10102 | The integers are answers to subtraction problems involving natural numbers [George/Velleman] |
| 17928 | Ordinal numbers represent order relations [Colyvan] |
| 10107 | Real numbers provide answers to square root problems [George/Velleman] |
| 9946 | Logicists say mathematics is applicable because it is totally general [George/Velleman] |
| 17923 | Intuitionists only accept a few safe infinities [Colyvan] |
| 10125 | The classical mathematician believes the real numbers form an actual set [George/Velleman] |
| 17941 | Infinitesimals were sometimes zero, and sometimes close to zero [Colyvan] |
| 17922 | Reducing real numbers to rationals suggested arithmetic as the foundation of maths [Colyvan] |
| 17899 | Second-order induction is stronger as it covers all concepts, not just first-order definable ones [George/Velleman] |
| 17936 | Transfinite induction moves from all cases, up to the limit ordinal [Colyvan] |
| 10128 | The Incompleteness proofs use arithmetic to talk about formal arithmetic [George/Velleman] |
| 17902 | A successor is the union of a set with its singleton [George/Velleman] |
| 10133 | Frege's Theorem shows the Peano Postulates can be derived from Hume's Principle [George/Velleman] |
| 17940 | Most mathematical proofs are using set theory, but without saying so [Colyvan] |
| 10130 | Set theory can prove the Peano Postulates [George/Velleman] |
| 17931 | Structuralism say only 'up to isomorphism' matters because that is all there is to it [Colyvan] |
| 17932 | If 'in re' structures relies on the world, does the world contain rich enough structures? [Colyvan] |
| 10089 | Talk of 'abstract entities' is more a label for the problem than a solution to it [George/Velleman] |
| 10131 | If mathematics is not about particulars, observing particulars must be irrelevant [George/Velleman] |
| 10092 | In the unramified theory of types, the types are objects, then sets of objects, sets of sets etc. [George/Velleman] |
| 10094 | The theory of types seems to rule out harmless sets as well as paradoxical ones. [George/Velleman] |
| 10095 | Type theory has only finitely many items at each level, which is a problem for mathematics [George/Velleman] |
| 17901 | Type theory prohibits (oddly) a set containing an individual and a set of individuals [George/Velleman] |
| 10114 | Bounded quantification is originally finitary, as conjunctions and disjunctions [George/Velleman] |
| 10134 | Much infinite mathematics can still be justified finitely [George/Velleman] |
| 10123 | The intuitionists are the idealists of mathematics [George/Velleman] |
| 10124 | Gödel's First Theorem suggests there are truths which are independent of proof [George/Velleman] |
| 17943 | Probability supports Bayesianism better as degrees of belief than as ratios of frequencies [Colyvan] |
| 17939 | Mathematics can reveal structural similarities in diverse systems [Colyvan] |
| 17938 | Mathematics can show why some surprising events have to occur [Colyvan] |
| 17934 | Proof by cases (by 'exhaustion') is said to be unexplanatory [Colyvan] |
| 17933 | Reductio proofs do not seem to be very explanatory [Colyvan] |
| 17935 | If inductive proofs hold because of the structure of natural numbers, they may explain theorems [Colyvan] |
| 17942 | Can a proof that no one understands (of the four-colour theorem) really be a proof? [Colyvan] |
| 17937 | Mathematical generalisation is by extending a system, or by abstracting away from it [Colyvan] |
| 10110 | Corresponding to every concept there is a class (some of them sets) [George/Velleman] |