Combining Philosophers

Ideas for Aristotle, Allan Gibbard and Deborah Achtenberg

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these philosophers

display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers

25 ideas

8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 1. Universals
Substance is not a universal, as the former is particular but a universal is shared [Aristotle]
Universals are indeterminate and only known in potential, because they are general [Aristotle, by Witt]
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 2. Need for Universals
Separate Forms aren't needed for logic, but universals (one holding of many) are essential [Aristotle]
The acquisition of scientific knowledge is impossible without universals [Aristotle]
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 3. Instantiated Universals
Colour must be in an individual body, or it is not embodied [Aristotle]
No universals exist separately from particulars [Aristotle]
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 6. Platonic Forms / a. Platonic Forms
Forms are said to be substances to which nothing is prior [Aristotle]
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 6. Platonic Forms / b. Partaking
If you accept Forms, you must accept the more powerful principle of 'participating' in them [Aristotle]
If partaking explains unity, what causes participating, and what is participating? [Aristotle]
There is a confusion because Forms are said to be universal, but also some Forms are separable and particular [Aristotle]
How can the Forms both be the substance of things and exist separately from them? [Aristotle]
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 6. Platonic Forms / c. Self-predication
Forms have to be their own paradigms, which seems to fuse the paradigm and the copy [Aristotle]
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 6. Platonic Forms / d. Forms critiques
Eternal white is no whiter than temporary white, and it is the same with goodness [Aristotle]
It is meaningless to speak of 'man-himself', because it has the same definition as plain 'man' [Aristotle]
If men exist by participating in two forms (Animal and Biped), they are plural, not unities [Aristotle]
Aristotle is not asserting facts about the location of properties, but about their ontological status [Aristotle, by Moreland]
Predications only pick out kinds of things, not things in themselves [Aristotle]
Are there forms for everything, or for negations, or for destroyed things? [Aristotle]
The Forms have to be potentialities, not actual knowledge or movement [Aristotle]
What possible contribution can the Forms make to perceptible entities? [Aristotle]
If two is part of three then numbers aren't Forms, because they would all be intermingled [Aristotle]
How will a vision of pure goodness make someone a better doctor? [Aristotle]
There is no point at all in the theory of Forms unless it contains a principle that produces movement [Aristotle]
All attempts to prove the Forms are either invalid, or prove Forms where there aren't supposed to be any [Aristotle]
We can forget the Forms, as they are irrelevant, and not needed in giving demonstrations [Aristotle]