Full Idea
We can say that 'Harvard-nominalism' is the thesis that there are no abstract objects, 'Oz-nominalism' that there are no universals, and Goodman's nominalism rejects entities, such as sets, which fail to obey a certain principle of composition.
Gist of Idea
Nominalism can reject abstractions, or universals, or sets
Source
Alex Oliver (The Metaphysics of Properties [1996], §15 n46)
Book Reference
-: 'Mind' [-], p.44
A Reaction
Personally I'm a Goodman-Harvard-Oz nominalist. What are you rebelling against? What have you got? We've been mesmerized by the workings of our own minds, which are trying to grapple with a purely physical world.