Single Idea 14337

[catalogued under 14. Science / D. Explanation / 3. Best Explanation / b. Ultimate explanation]

Full Idea

I will consider the case for an ontology of real dispositions replacing the so-called laws of nature as the basic building blocks of explanation.

Gist of Idea

Maybe dispositions can replace the 'laws of nature' as the basis of explanation

Source

Stephen Mumford (Dispositions [1998], 10.1)

Book Reference

Mumford,Stephen: 'Dispositions' [OUP 1998], p.216


A Reaction

This precisely summarises the view I am exploring, with a particular focus on real essences. I certainly think the 'laws of nature' must go. See Mumford's second book on this.