Full Idea
Explanatory considerations help with the raven paradox since, while the raven hypothesis may provide an explanation for the blackness of a particular raven, neither the original hypothesis nor its contrastive explanation explain why the shoe is white.
Gist of Idea
A theory may explain the blackness of a raven, but say nothing about the whiteness of shoes
Source
Peter Lipton (Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd) [2004], 06 'Unsuitable')
Book Reference
Lipton,Peter: 'Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd ed)' [Routledge 2004], p.92
A Reaction
For me, the examination of ravens is a search for the essence of ravenhood, which is why non-ravens don't help. Of course, if you eliminate all culprits except one, you have your culprit, but will your evidence stand up in court?