Full Idea
If explanation often tracks dependence, then we have a theoretical reason to expect such explanations to exist. Let us call such explanations 'determinative'.
Gist of Idea
If explanations track dependence, then 'determinative' explanations seem to exist
Source
David Liggins (Truth-makers and dependence [2012], 10.4)
Book Reference
'Metaphysical Grounding', ed/tr. Correia,F/Schnieder,B [CUP 2012], p.262
A Reaction
There seems to be an emerging understanding that this 'determination' relation is central to all of explanation - with causal explanations, for example, being a particular instance of it. I like it. These are real, not conventional, explanations.