Full Idea
Critics of emotivism claim that moral agreement need not track agreement in attitude; moralists with the same attitude can disagree in their views, and they can hold the same view while disagreeing in attitude.
Gist of Idea
Two people might agree in their emotional moral attitude while disagreeing in their judgement
Source
David O. Brink (Emotivism [1995], p.224)
Book Reference
'Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy', ed/tr. Audi,Robert [CUP 1995], p.224
A Reaction
Thus two racists can disagree about how racists should behave. Sounds like a good criticism.