Full Idea
That one-to-one correlated sets of objects are equinumerous is a more sophisticated achievement than the simple ability to count sets of objects.
Gist of Idea
Simple counting is more basic than spotting that one-to-one correlation makes sets equinumerous
Source
E.J. Lowe (The Possibility of Metaphysics [1998], 2.9)
Book Reference
Lowe,E.J.: 'The Possibility of Metaphysics' [OUP 2001], p.49
A Reaction
This is an objection to Frege's way of defining numbers, in terms of equinumerous sets. I take pattern-recognition to be the foundation of number, and so spotting a pattern would have to precede spotting that two patterns were identical.