Full Idea
Where there is one-to-one correspondence there must certainly be countable, and therefore individuable items of some kind.
Gist of Idea
One-to-one correspondence would need countable, individuable items
Source
E.J. Lowe (The Possibility of Metaphysics [1998], 11.6)
Book Reference
Lowe,E.J.: 'The Possibility of Metaphysics' [OUP 2001], p.245
A Reaction
Lowe is criticising precise notions of 'a fact'. We can respond by relaxing the notion of 'one-to-one', if critics are going to be fussy about exactly what the items are. "There is a huge wave coming" doesn't need a precise notion of a wave to be true.