Full Idea
Foundationalists find it difficult to attach a clear and defensible content to the idea that basic beliefs that are characterized as 'self-justified' or 'self-evident'.
Gist of Idea
It is hard to give the concept of 'self-evident' a clear and defensible characterization
Source
Laurence Bonjour (A Version of Internalist Foundationalism [2003], 1.4)
Book Reference
Bonjour,L/Sosa,E: 'Epistemic Justification' [Blackwells 2003], p.16
A Reaction
A little surprising from a fan of a priori foundations, especially given that 'self-evident' is common usage, and not just philosophers' jargon. I think we can talk of self-evidence without a precise definition. We talk of an 'ocean' without trouble.