more on this theme | more from this text
Full Idea
The If-thenist view seems to apply straightforwardly only to the axiomatised portions of mathematics.
Gist of Idea
The If-thenist view only seems to work for the axiomatised portions of mathematics
Source
Alan Musgrave (Logicism Revisited [1977], §5)
Book Ref
-: 'British Soc for the Philosophy of Science' [-], p.119
A Reaction
He cites Lakatos to show that cutting-edge mathematics is never axiomatised. One might reply that if the new mathematics is any good then it ought to be axiomatis-able (barring Gödelian problems).
Related Idea
Idea 8752 Deductivism says mathematics is logical consequences of uninterpreted axioms [Shapiro]
| 10049 | Logical truths may contain non-logical notions, as in 'all men are men' [Musgrave] |
| 10050 | A statement is logically true if it comes out true in all interpretations in all (non-empty) domains [Musgrave] |
| 10060 | Logical positivists adopted an If-thenist version of logicism about numbers [Musgrave] |
| 10058 | No two numbers having the same successor relies on the Axiom of Infinity [Musgrave] |
| 10062 | Formalism seems to exclude all creative, growing mathematics [Musgrave] |
| 10063 | Formalism is a bulwark of logical positivism [Musgrave] |
| 10061 | The If-thenist view only seems to work for the axiomatised portions of mathematics [Musgrave] |
| 10065 | Perhaps If-thenism survives in mathematics if we stick to first-order logic [Musgrave] |