more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
If we identify logic with first-order logic, and mathematics with the collection of first-order theories, then maybe we can continue to maintain the If-thenist position.
Gist of Idea
Perhaps If-thenism survives in mathematics if we stick to first-order logic
Source
Alan Musgrave (Logicism Revisited [1977], §5)
Book Ref
-: 'British Soc for the Philosophy of Science' [-], p.124
A Reaction
The problem is that If-thenism must rely on rules of inference. That seems to mean that what is needed is Soundness, rather than Completeness. That is, inference by the rules must work properly.
| 10054 | Arithmetic and geometry achieve some certainty without worrying about existence [Descartes] |
| 10055 | Mathematical proofs work, irrespective of whether the objects exist [Locke] |
| 10056 | At bottom eternal truths are all conditional [Leibniz] |
| 14783 | Logic, unlike mathematics, is not hypothetical; it asserts categorical ends from hypothetical means [Peirce] |
| 21493 | Pure mathematics deals only with hypotheses, of which the reality does not matter [Peirce] |
| 24137 | Mathematics is just accurate inferences from definitions, and doesn't involve objects [Nietzsche] |
| 10053 | Geometrical axioms imply the propositions, but the former may not be true [Russell] |
| 10064 | Quine quickly dismisses If-thenism [Quine, by Musgrave] |
| 10066 | Putnam coined the term 'if-thenism' [Putnam, by Musgrave] |
| 10061 | The If-thenist view only seems to work for the axiomatised portions of mathematics [Musgrave] |
| 10065 | Perhaps If-thenism survives in mathematics if we stick to first-order logic [Musgrave] |
| 17620 | Critics of if-thenism say that not all starting points, even consistent ones, are worth studying [Maddy] |
| 22291 | Deductivism can't explain how the world supports unconditional conclusions [Potter] |