more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
Any consistent, axiomatized, negation-complete formal theory is decidable.
Gist of Idea
Any consistent, axiomatized, negation-complete formal theory is decidable
Source
Peter Smith (Intro to Gödel's Theorems [2007], 03.6)
Book Ref
Smith,Peter: 'An Introduction to Gödel's Theorems' [CUP 2007], p.26
18758 | Validity is provable, but invalidity isn't, because the model is infinite [Church, by McGee] |
9996 | Expressions are 'decidable' if inclusion in them (or not) can be proved [Enderton] |
10080 | 'Effective' means simple, unintuitive, independent, controlled, dumb, and terminating [Smith,P] |
10087 | A theory is 'decidable' if all of its sentences could be mechanically proved [Smith,P] |
10088 | Any consistent, axiomatized, negation-complete formal theory is decidable [Smith,P] |
10156 | 'Recursion theory' concerns what can be solved by computing machines [Feferman/Feferman] |
10155 | Both Principia Mathematica and Peano Arithmetic are undecidable [Feferman/Feferman] |