more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10088

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / K. Features of Logics / 7. Decidability ]

Full Idea

Any consistent, axiomatized, negation-complete formal theory is decidable.

Gist of Idea

Any consistent, axiomatized, negation-complete formal theory is decidable

Source

Peter Smith (Intro to Gödel's Theorems [2007], 03.6)

Book Ref

Smith,Peter: 'An Introduction to Gödel's Theorems' [CUP 2007], p.26


The 7 ideas with the same theme [are positive or negative answers always possible?]:

Validity is provable, but invalidity isn't, because the model is infinite [Church, by McGee]
Expressions are 'decidable' if inclusion in them (or not) can be proved [Enderton]
'Effective' means simple, unintuitive, independent, controlled, dumb, and terminating [Smith,P]
A theory is 'decidable' if all of its sentences could be mechanically proved [Smith,P]
Any consistent, axiomatized, negation-complete formal theory is decidable [Smith,P]
'Recursion theory' concerns what can be solved by computing machines [Feferman/Feferman]
Both Principia Mathematica and Peano Arithmetic are undecidable [Feferman/Feferman]