more on this theme
|
more from this thinker
Single Idea 10191
[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / a. Axioms for sets
]
Full Idea
Lewis has shown that set theory may be reduced to a mereological theory in which singletons are the only atoms.
Gist of Idea
Set theory reduces to a mereological theory with singletons as the only atoms
Source
report of David Lewis (Parts of Classes [1991]) by Fraser MacBride - Review of Chihara's 'Structural Acc of Maths' p.80
Book Ref
-: 'Bulletin of Symbolic Logic' [-], p.80
A Reaction
Presumably the axiom of extensionality, that a set is no more than its members, translates into unrestricted composition, that any parts will make an object. Difficult territory, but I suspect that this is of great importance in metaphysics.
The
35 ideas
from 'Parts of Classes'
18395
|
Sets are mereological sums of the singletons of their members
[Lewis, by Armstrong]
|
10566
|
Lewis prefers giving up singletons to giving up sums
[Lewis, by Fine,K]
|
14244
|
Lewis only uses fusions to create unities, but fusions notoriously flatten our distinctions
[Oliver/Smiley on Lewis]
|
10191
|
Set theory reduces to a mereological theory with singletons as the only atoms
[Lewis, by MacBride]
|
15497
|
We can replace the membership relation with the member-singleton relation (plus mereology)
[Lewis]
|
15496
|
We can build set theory on singletons: classes are then fusions of subclasses, membership is the singleton
[Lewis]
|
15500
|
Classes divide into subclasses in many ways, but into members in only one way
[Lewis]
|
15499
|
A subclass of a subclass is itself a subclass; a member of a member is not in general a member
[Lewis]
|
15498
|
We can accept the null set, but there is no null class of anything
[Lewis]
|
15501
|
We have no idea of a third sort of thing, that isn't an individual, a class, or their mixture
[Lewis]
|
15503
|
We needn't accept this speck of nothingness, this black hole in the fabric of Reality!
[Lewis]
|
15502
|
There are four main reasons for asserting that there is an empty set
[Lewis]
|
15504
|
Atomless gunk is an individual whose parts all have further proper parts
[Lewis]
|
15506
|
If we don't understand the singleton, then we don't understand classes
[Lewis]
|
15507
|
Set theory has some unofficial axioms, generalisations about how to understand it
[Lewis]
|
15508
|
If singletons are where their members are, then so are all sets
[Lewis]
|
15509
|
Some say qualities are parts of things - as repeatable universals, or as particulars
[Lewis]
|
15511
|
If singleton membership is external, why is an object a member of one rather than another?
[Lewis]
|
15512
|
In mereology no two things consist of the same atoms
[Lewis]
|
15513
|
Maybe singletons have a structure, of a thing and a lasso?
[Lewis]
|
15514
|
A huge part of Reality is only accepted as existing if you have accepted set theory
[Lewis]
|
15515
|
To be a structuralist, you quantify over relations
[Lewis]
|
15516
|
A property is any class of possibilia
[Lewis]
|
15517
|
Giving up classes means giving up successful mathematics because of dubious philosophy
[Lewis]
|
15518
|
I like plural quantification, but am not convinced of its connection with second-order logic
[Lewis]
|
15520
|
Existence doesn't come in degrees; once asserted, it can't then be qualified
[Lewis]
|
15519
|
Trout-turkeys exist, despite lacking cohesion, natural joints and united causal power
[Lewis]
|
15521
|
Given cats, a fusion of cats adds nothing further to reality
[Lewis]
|
15522
|
The one has different truths from the many; it is one rather than many, one rather than six
[Lewis]
|
14748
|
The many are many and the one is one, so they can't be identical
[Lewis]
|
15523
|
Set theory isn't innocent; it generates infinities from a single thing; but mathematics needs it
[Lewis]
|
15524
|
Zermelo's model of arithmetic is distinctive because it rests on a primitive of set theory
[Lewis]
|
15525
|
Plural quantification lacks a complete axiom system
[Lewis]
|
10660
|
A commitment to cat-fusions is not a further commitment; it is them and they are it
[Lewis]
|
6129
|
Lewis affirms 'composition as identity' - that an object is no more than its parts
[Lewis, by Merricks]
|